Relation of EGFR/PI3K/AKT signaling components with tamoxifen efficacy in patients with estrogen-dependent breast cancer
https://doi.org/10.17650/2313-805X-2018-5-3-40-50
Abstract
Background. It is generally accepted that crosstalk between the growth factor receptor and ER pathways implicated in tamoxifen resistance. The aim of the study was to examine the relationship between mRNA level, protein expression and gene polymorphism of the EGFR/PI3K/AKT signaling components with tamoxifen efficacy in patients with estrogen-dependent breast cancer. Materials and methods. The study included 95 breast cancer patients who had received adjuvant tamoxifen, of which 31 patients developed recurrence/metastasis after tamoxifen treatment (tamoxifen resistance group), 64 patients did not develop any diseases progression (tamoxifen sensitive group) during the 5 years of follow-up. Genotypes for ESR1 (rs2077647, rs2228480, rs1801132), EGFR (rs1468727, rs2227983), AKT1 (rs1130233) and PTEN (rs11202592) were analyzed using a TaqMan assay. Using reverse transcription-PCR, the relative expression of mRNA for ESR1, EGFR, AKT1 and PTEN was determined. ERα, EGFR, Akt (pS473) and PTEN expression level was evaluated using immunohistochemistry. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by Kaplan – Meier analysis. Results. The minor allele of ESR1 rs2077647 was more prevalent in tamoxifen sensitive tumors compared to tamoxifen resistant tumors (p = 0.044). We found high AKT1 mRNA expression level in tamoxifen sensitive group compared with tamoxifen resistance patients (7.27 ± 5.29 and 0.02 ± 0.01, respectively, p = 0.014). ESR1 rs2228480 was significantly associated with tamoxifen resistance (p = 0.028). EGFR and Akt (pS473) protein expression level was significantly higher in the tamoxifen resistance group compared to tamoxifen sensitive breast cancer patients (p = 0.006 and 0.037, respectively). Patients carrying mutant genotypes of ESR1 rs2228480 had a poorer progression-free survival than those carrying wild and heterozygous variants (log rank p = 0.043). Positive EGFR tumor expression as well as positive Akt (pS473) expression were significantly associated with shorter PFS (log rank p = 0.014 and 0.048, respectively). Conclusion. Polymorphic sites of the ESR1 gene, AKT1 mRNA expression, EGFR expression level and Akt (pS473) protein expression can be potential molecular markers associated with tumor sensitivity/resistance to tamoxifen treatment.
About the Authors
T. A. DronovaRussian Federation
N. N. Babyshkina
Russian Federation
M. V. Zavyalova
Russian Federation
S. V. Patalyak
Russian Federation
E. M. Slonimskaya
Russian Federation
N. V. Cherdyntseva
Russian Federation
J. G. Kzhyshkowska
Russian Federation
References
1. Senkus E., Kyriakides S., PenaultLlorca F. et al. Primary breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2013;24:vi7–vi23. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt284. PMID: 26314782.
2. Burstein H.J., Lacchetti C., Anderson H. et al. Adjuvant Endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on ovarian suppression. J Clin Oncol 2016;34(14):1689–701. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.9573. PMID: 26884586.
3. Crew K.D., Albain K.S., Hershman D.L. et al. How do we increase uptake of tamoxifen and other anti-estrogens for breast cancer prevention? NPJ Breast Cancer 2017;3(20):1–7. DOI: 10.1038/s41523-017-0021-y. PMID: 28649660.
4. Pan H., Gray R., Braybrooke J. et al. 20- year risks of breast-cancer recurrence after stopping endocrine therapy at 5 years. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1836–46. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701830. PMID: 29117498.
5. Chang M. Tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 2012;20(3): 256–7. DOI: 10.4062/biomolther. 2012.20.3.256. PMID: 24130921.
6. Velloso F.J., Bianco A.F., Farias J.O. et al. The crossroads of breast cancer progression: insights into the modulation of major signaling pathways. Oncol Targets Ther 2017;10:5491–524. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S142154. PMID: 29200866.
7. Wee P., Wang Z. Epidermal growth factor receptor cell proliferation signaling pathways. Cancers(Basel) 2017;9(5):52. DOI: 10.3390/cancers9050052. PMID: 28513565.
8. Paplomata E., O’Regan R. The PI3K/ AKT/mTOR pathway in breast cancer: targets, trials and biomarkers. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2014;6(4):154–66. DOI: 10.1177/1758834014530023. PMID: 25057302.
9. Lee J.J., Loh K., Yap Y.S. PI3K/Akt/ mTOR inhibitors in breast cancer. Cancer Biol Med 2015;12(4):342–54. DOI: 10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941. 2015.0089. PMID: 26779371.
10. Giltnane J.M., Ryden L., Cregger M. et al. Quantitative measurement of epidermal growth factor receptor is a negative predictive factor for tamoxifen response in hormone receptor positive premenopausal breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:3007–14. DOI: 10.1200/ JCO.2006.08.9938. PMID: 17634479.
11. Massarweh S., Osborne C.K., Creighton C.J. et al. Tamoxifen resistance in breast tumors is driven by growth factor receptor signaling with repression of classic estrogen receptor genomic function. Cancer Res 2008;68(3):826–33. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2707. PMID: 18245484.
12. Kim S., Lee J., Oh S.J. et al. Differential effect of EGFR inhibitors on tamoxifenresistant breast cancer cells. Oncol Rep 2015;34(3):1613–9. DOI: 10.3892/or.2015.4116. PMID: 26166014.
13. Babyshkina N., Vtorushin S., Zavyalova M. et al. The distribution pattern of ERα expression, ESR1 genetic variation and expression of growth factor receptors: association with breast cancer prognosis in Russian patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. Clin Exp Med 2017;17(3):383–93. DOI: 10.1007/s10238-016-0428-z. PMID: 27225751.
14. Kirkegaard T., Witton C.J., McGlynn L.M. et al. AKT activation predicts outcome in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. J Pathol 2005;207:139–46. DOI: org/10.1002/path.1829. PMID: 16088978.
15. Tanic N., Milovanovic Z., Tanic N. et al. The impact of PTEN tumor suppressor gene on acquiring resistance to tamoxifen treatment in breast cancer patients. Cancer Biol Ther 2012;13(12):1165–74. DOI: 10.4161/cbt.21346. PMID: 22892847.
16. Li T., Zhao J., Yang J. et al. A Metaanalysis of the association between ESR1 genetic variants and the risk of breast cancer. PLoS One 2016;11(4):e0153314. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153314. PMID: 27070141.
17. Hsiao W.C., Young K.C., Lin S.L. et al. Estrogen receptor-alpha polymorphism in a Taiwanese clinical breast cancer population: a case-control study. Breast Cancer Res 2004;6(3):180–6. DOI: 10.1186/bcr770. PMID: 15084241.
18. Fernandez L.P., Milne R.L., Barroso E. et al. Estrogen and progesterone receptor gene polymorphisms and sporadic breast cancer risk: a Spanish case-control study. Int J Cancer 2006;119(2):467–71. DOI: 10.1002/ijc. 21847. PMID: 16477637.
19. Anghel A., Raica M., Narita D. Estrogen receptor alpha polymorphisms: correlation with clinicopathological parameters in breast cancer. Neoplasma 2010;57(4):306–15. PMID: 20429621.
20. Chong K., Subramanian A., Sharma A. et al. Measuring IGF-1, ER-α and EGFR expression can predict tamoxifenresistance in ER-positive breast cancer. Anticancer Res 2011;31(1):23–32. PMID: 21273576.
21. Xuan Q.J., Wang J.X., Nanding A. et al. Tumor-associated macrophages are correlated with tamoxifen resistance in the postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Pathol Oncol Res 2014;20(3):619–24. DOI: 10.1007/ s12253-013-9740-z. PMID: 24414992.
22. Bae S.Y., Nam S.J., Lee S.K. et al. Tamoxifen resistance: EGFR expression in hormone receptor-positive and HER2 negative breast cancer. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: Report abstract Cancer Res 2017;77(4):9–36. DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.
23. van Agthoven T., Veldscholte J., Smid M. et al. Functional identification of genes causing estrogen independence of human breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;114(1):23–30. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-9969-5. PMID: 18351453.
24. van Agthoven T., Godinho M.F., Wulfkuhle J.D. et al. Protein pathway activation mapping reveals molecular networks associated with antiestrogen resistance in breast cancer cell lines. Int J Cancer 2012;131(9):1998–2007. DOI: 10.1002/ijc. 27489.
25. Riggio M., Perrone M.C., Polo M.L. et al. AKT1 and AKT2 isoforms play distinct roles during breast cancer progression through the regulation of specific downstream proteins. Sci Rep 2017;7:44244. DOI: 10.1038/srep44244. PMID: 28287129.
26. Bostner J., Karlsson E., Pandiyan M.J. et al. Activation of Akt, mTOR, and the estrogen receptor as a signature to predict tamoxifen treatment benefit. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013;137(2):397– 406. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2376-y. PMID: 23242584.
Review
For citations:
Dronova T.A., Babyshkina N.N., Zavyalova M.V., Patalyak S.V., Slonimskaya E.M., Cherdyntseva N.V., Kzhyshkowska J.G. Relation of EGFR/PI3K/AKT signaling components with tamoxifen efficacy in patients with estrogen-dependent breast cancer. Advances in Molecular Oncology. 2018;5(3):40-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/2313-805X-2018-5-3-40-50