Depolymerization of tubulin as the main molecular mechanism of the cytotoxic and antitumor activity of pyrrole-containing heterocyclic compounds

   Introduction. Microtubules are highly dynamic polymers of α, β-tubulin dimers involves in a broad spectrum of the processes, such as intracellular transport and cell proliferation. This makes them an attractive molecular target for anti-cancer therapies. Substances that affect the dynamic state of tubulin microtubules are known as the mitotic poisons that are effective
and widely used in the chemotherapy of various tumors. Mitotic poisons are able to interfere with polymerization (stabilization) or depolymerization of tubulin, which in turn leads to the arrest of cells in the M-phase (named as a mitotic catastrophe) and their subsequent death via activation of apoptotic mechanisms. However, the effectiveness of MP-based therapies is gradually decreasing over the time due to development of multiple drug resistance mechanisms in cancer cells. Thus, development of novel compounds selectively targeting tubulin and effectively overcoming multiple drug
resistance phenotype in cancer is an urgent need in current oncology.

   Aim. To examine the cytotoxic and antitumor activities of several pyrrole-containing heterocyclic compounds (EPC-91, EPC-92 and PCA-93) against cancer cell lines with epithelial and mesenchymal origin, including those with multiple drug resistance phenotype.

   Materials and methods. Studies were performed on parental human cancer cell lines – triple-negative breast cancer HCC1806, gastrointestinal stromal tumor GIST T-1, osteosarcoma SaOS-2, – sensitive to chemotherapy (paclitaxel, doxorubicin) and their resistant sublines (HCC1806 Tx-R, GIST T-1 Tx-R, SaOS-2 Dox-R), as well as on murine colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line Colon-26, exhibiting primary resistance to the aforementioned chemotherapeutic agents.

   Results. The cytotoxic activities of EPC-91 and PCA-93 were due to their abilities to depolymerize tubulin. The results of immunofluorescence microscopy and Western blotting indicated that the compounds disrupt assembly of tubulin microtubules and prevent polymerization of α-tubulin in cancer cells. Inhibition of tubulin polymerizations led to significant increase
in number of round-shaped and phospho-histone 3 (e. g. mitotic) cells, followed by their death through apoptosis. PCA-93 also exhibited potent anti-tumor effect against Colon-26 cells due to its anti-proliferative and proapoptotic activities.

   Conclusion. The data shown here illustrates potent cytotoxic activities of EPC-91 and PCA-93 against multiple cancer cell lines in vitro including those with multiple drug resistance phenotype. Similarly, PCA-93 was found to be highly effective against Colon-26 cell in vivo, thereby illustrating the attractive platform for the development of novel pyrrole-based agents exhibiting potent anti-tumor activities.

1. Bhardwaj V., Gumber D., Abbot V. et al. Pyrrole: a resourceful small molecule in key medicinal hetero-aromatics. RSC Adv 2015;5:15233–66. DOI: 10.1039/C4RA15710A

2. DeSimone R.W., Currie K.S., Mitchell S.A. et al. Privileged structures: applications in drug discovery. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2004;7(5):473–93. DOI: 10.2174/1386207043328544

3. Duarte C.D., Barreiro E.J., Fraga C.A.M. Privileged structures: a useful concept for the rational design of new lead drug candidates. Mini-Rev Med Chem 2007;7(11):1108–19. DOI: 10.2174/138955707782331722

4. Li Petri G., Spanò V., Spatola R. et al. Bioactive pyrrole-based compounds with target selectivity. Eur J Med Chem 2020;208:112783. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112783

5. Walsh C.T., Garneau-Tsodikova S., Howard-Jones A.R. Biological formation of pyrroles: Nature’s logic and enzymatic machinery. Nat Prod Rep 2006;23:517–31. DOI: 10.1039/b605245m

6. Ahmad S., Alam O., Naim M.J. et al. Pyrrole: An insight into recent pharmacological advances with structure activity relationship. Eur J Med Chem 2018;157:527–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.08.002

7. Bianco M.C.A.D., Marinho D.I.L.F., Hoelz L.V.B. et al. Pyrroles as privileged scaffolds in the search for new potential HIV inhibitors. Pharmaceuticals 2021;14(9):893. DOI: 10.3390/ph14090893

8. La Regina G., Bai R., Coluccia A. et al. New pyrrole derivatives with potent tubulin polymerization inhibiting activity as anticancer agents including hedgehog-dependent cancer. J Med Chem 2014;57:6531–52. DOI: 10.1021/jm500561a

9. Jadala C., Prasad B., Prasanthi A.V.G. et al. Transition metal-free one-pot synthesis of substituted pyrroles by employing aza-Wittig reaction. RSC Adv 2019;9:30659–65. DOI: 10.1039/C9RA06778G

10. Tang S., Zhou Z., Jiang Z. et al. Indole-based tubulin inhibitors: binding modes and sars investigations. Molecules 2022;27(5):1587. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27051587

11. Romagnoli R., Oliva P., Salvador M.K. et al. A facile synthesis of diaryl pyrroles led to the discovery of potent colchicine site antimitotic agents. Eur J Med Chem 2021;214:113229. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113229

12. Sun J., Chen L., Liu C. et al. Synthesis and biological evaluations of 1,2-diaryl pyrroles as analogues of combretastatin A-4. Chem Biol Drug Des 2015;86(6):1541–7. DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.12617

13. Ma Z., Ma Z., Zhang D. Synthesis of multi-substituted pyrrole derivatives through [3+2] cycloaddition with tosylmethyl isocyanides (TosMICs) and electron-deficient compounds. Molecules 2018;23(10):2666. DOI: 10.3390/molecules23102666

14. Mowery P., Mejia F.B., Franceschi C.L. et al. Synthesis and evaluation of the anti-proliferative activity of diaryl-3-pyrrolin-2-ones and fused analogs. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett 2017;27(2):191–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.11.076

15. Boichuk S., Galembikova A., Syuzov K. et al. The design, synthesis, and biological activities of pyrrole-based carboxamides: the novel tubulin inhibitors targeting the colchicine-binding site. Molecules 2021;26(19):5780. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26195780

16. Findeisen P., Mühlhausen S., Dempewolf S. et al. Six subgroups and extensive recent duplications characterize the evolution of the eukaryotic tubulin protein family. Genome Biol Evol 2014;6(9):2274–88. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evu187

17. Avila J. Microtubule functions. Life Sci 1992;50(5):327–34. DOI: 10.1016/0024-3205(92)90433-P

18. Vukušić K., Buđa R., Tolić I.M. Force-generating mechanisms of anaphase in human cells. J Cell Sci 2019;132(18):jcs231985. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.231985

19. de Forges H., Bouissou A., Perez F. Interplay between microtubule dynamics and intracellular organization. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2012;44(2):266–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2011.11.009

20. Bonifacino J.S., Neefjes J. Moving and positioning the endolysosomal system. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2017;47:266–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2017.01.008

21. Wood K.W., Cornwell W.D., Jackson J.R. Past and future of the mitotic spindle as an oncology target. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2001;1(4):370–7. DOI: 10.1016/s1471-4892(01)00064-9

22. von Hoff D.D. The taxoids: Same roots, different drugs. Semin Oncol 1997;24(13):S13-3–10.

23. Bollag D.M., McQueney P.A., Zhu J. et al. Epothilones, a new class of microtubule-stabilizing agents with a taxol-like mechanism of action. Cancer Res 1995;55(11):2325–33.

24. Gigant B., Wang C., Ravelli R.B.G. et al. Structural basis for the regulation of tubulin by vinblastine. Nature 2005;435(7041):519–22. DOI: 10.1038/nature03566

25. Hastie S.B. Interactions of colchicine with tubulin. Pharmacol Ther 1991;51(3):377–401. DOI: 10.1016/0163-7258(91)90067-V

26. Mooberry S.L., Tien G., Hernandez A.H. et al. Laulimalide and isolaulimalide, new paclitaxel-like microtubule-stabilizing agents. Cancer Res 1999;59(3):653–60.

27. Hamel E. Natural products which interact with tubulin in the vinca domain: Maytansine, rhizoxin, phomopsin a, dolastatins 10 and 15 and halichondrin B. Pharmacol Ther 1992;55(1):31–51. DOI: 10.1016/0163-7258(92)90028-X

28. Jordan M.A., Wilson L. Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat Cancer 2004;4(4):253–65. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1317

29. Stanton R.A., Gernert K.M., Nettles J.H. et al. Drugs that target dynamic microtubules: a new molecular perspective. Med Res Rev 2011;31(3):443–81. DOI: 10.1002/med.20242

30. Ravelli R.B., Gigant G., Curmi B. et al. Insight into tubulin regulation from a complex with colchicine and a stathmin-like domain. Nature 2004;428(6979):198–202. DOI: 10.1038/nature02393

31. Yang J., Wang Y., Wang T. et al. Pironetin reacts covalently with cysteine-316 of α-tubulin to destabilize microtubule. Nat Commun 2016;7:12103. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12103

32. Prota A.E., Setter J., Waight A.B. et al. Pironetin binds covalently to αCys316 and perturbs a major loop and helix of α-tubulin to inhibit microtubule formation. J Mol Biol 2016;428(15):2981–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.06.023

33. Steinmetz M.O., Prota A.E. Microtubule-targeting agents: strategies to hijack the cytoskeleton. Trends Cell Biol 2018;28(10):776–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.05.001

34. Fanale D., Bronte G., Passiglia F. et al. Stabilizing versus destabilizing the microtubules: A double-edge sword for an effective cancer treatment option? Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) 2015;2015:690916. DOI: 10.1155/2015/690916

35. West L.M., Northcote P.T., Battershill C.N. Peloruside A. A potent cytotoxic macrolide isolated from the New Zealand marine sponge Mycale sp. J Org Chem 2000;65(2):445–9. DOI: 10.1021/jo991296y

36. Prota A.E., Bargsten K., Northcote P.T. et al. Structural basis of microtubule stabilization by laulimalide and peloruside A. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2014;53(6):1621–5. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201307749.

37. Chaplin D.J., Hill S.A. The development of combretastatin A4 phosphate as a vascular targeting agent. Int J Radiat Oncol 2002;54(5):1491–6. DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)03924-X

38. Siemann D.W., Shi W. Dual targeting of tumor vasculature: combining Avastin and vascular disrupting agents (CA4P or OXi4503). Anticancer Res 2008;28(4 B):2027–31.

39. Lindamulage I.K., Vu H.-Y., Karthikeyan C. et al. Novel quinolone chalcones targeting colchicine-binding pocket kill multidrug-resistant cancer cells by inhibiting tubulin activity and MRP1 function. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):10298. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10972-0

40. Gupta S., Banerjee M., Poddar A. et al. Biphasic kinetics of the colchicine−tubulin interaction: role of amino acids surrounding the A ring of bound colchicine molecule. Biochemistry 2005;44(30):10181–8. DOI: 10.1021/bi050599l

41. McLoughlin E.C., O’Boyle N.M. Colchicine-binding site inhibitors from chemistry to clinic : a review. Pharmaceuticals 2020;13(1):8. DOI: 10.3390/ph13010008

42. Arnst K.E., Banerjee S., Chen H. et al. Current advances of tubulin inhibitors as dual acting small molecules for cancer therapy. Med Res Rev 2019;39(4):1398–426. DOI: 10.1002/med.21568

43. Зыкова С.С., Бойчук С.В., Галембикова А.Р. и др. 3-гидрокси-1,5-диарил-4-пивалоил-2,5-дигидро-2-пирролоны нарушают процессы митоза и индуцируют гибель опухолевых клеток in vitro. Цитология 2014;56:439–42. – Zykova S.S., Boychuk S.V., Galimbekova A.R. et al. 3-hydroxy-1,5-diaryl-4-pivaloyl-2,5-dihydro-2-pyrrolone disrupt the processes of mitosis and induce the death of tumor cells in vitro. Citologiya = Cytology 2014;56:439–42. (In Russ.).

44. Boichuk S., Galembikova A., Zykova S. et al. Ethyl-2-amino-pyrrole-3-carboxylates are novel potent anticancer agents that affect tubulin polymerization, induce G2/M cell-cycle arrest, and effectively inhibit soft tissue cancer cell growth in vitro. Anti-Cancer Drugs 2016;27(7):620–34. DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000372

45. Boichuk S., Galembikova A., Dunaev P. et al. Ethyl-2-amino-pyrrole-3-carboxylates are active against imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors in vitro and in vivo. Anti-Cancer Drugs 2019;30(5):475–84. DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000753

46. Boichuk S., Bikinieva F., Mustafin I. et al. 2-Amino-pyrrole-carboxylate attenuates homology-mediated DNA repair and sensitizes cancer cells to doxorubicin. Biochemistry (Mosc) 2022;87(5):391–9. DOI: 10.1134/S0006297922050017

47. Boichuk S., Syuzov K., Bikinieva F. et al. Computational-based discovery of the anti-cancer activities of pyrrole-based compounds targeting the colchicine-binding site of tubulin. Molecules 2022;27(9):2873. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092873

48. Boichuk S., Galembikova A., Bikinieva F. et al. 2-APCAs, the novel microtubule targeting agents active against distinct cancer cell lines. Molecules 2021;26(3):616. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26030616

49. Galembikova A.R., Dunaev P.D., Bikinieva F.F. et al. Mechanisms of cytotoxic activity of pyrrole-carboxamides against multidrug-resistant tumor cell sublines. Uspekhi molekulyarnoy onkologii = Advances in Molecular Oncology 2023;10(3):59–71. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/2313-805X-2023-10-3-59-71

50. Carta D., Bortolozzi R., Sturlese M. et al. Synthesis, structure-activity relationships and biological evaluation of 7-phenyl-pyrroloquinolinone 3-amide derivatives as potent antimitotic agents. Eur J Med Chem 2017;127:643–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.10.026

51. Brindisi M., Ulivieri C., Alfano G. et al. Structure-activity relationships, biological evaluation and structural studies of novel pyrrolonaphthoxazepines as antitumor agents. Eur J Med Chem 2019;162:290–320. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.11.004

52. Zykova S.S., Galembikova A.R., Ramazanov B.R. et al. Synthesis and cytotoxic activity of ethyl 2-amino-1-benzamido-4-oxo-5-(2-oxo-2-arylethylidene)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxylates. Pharm Chem J 2016;49(12):817–20. DOI: 10.1007/s11094-016-1378-1

53. Zykova S.S., Igidov N.M., Zakhmatov A.V. et al. Synthesis and biological activity of 2-amino-1-aryl-5-(3,3-dimethyl-2-oxobutylidene)-4-oxo-n-(thiazol-5-yl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrole-3-carboxamides. Pharm Chem J 2018;52(3):198–204.

54. Zykova S.S., Kizimova I.A., Syutkina A.I. et al. Synthesis and cytostatic activity of (e)-ethyl-2-amino-5-(3,3-dimethyl-4-oxobutyliden)-4-oxo-1- (2-phenylaminobenzamido)-4,5-dihydro-1hpyrrol-3-carboxylate. Pharm Chem J 2020;53:895–8. DOI: 10.1007/s11094-020-02096-z

55. Boichuk S., Galembikova A., Sitenkov A. et al. Establishment and characterization of a triple negative basal-like breast cancer cell line with multi-drug resistance. Oncol Lett 2017;14(4):5039–45. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6795

56. Boichuk S., Bikinieva F., Valeeva E. et al. Establishment and characterization of multi-drug resistant p53-negative osteosarcoma SaOS-2 subline. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023;13(16):2646. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13162646

57. Khusnutdinov R.R., Galembikova A.R., Boichuk S.V. Establishment of the clone of gastrointestinal stromal tumor cells with the signs of multiple drug resistance and assessment of its properties. Sovremennye tehnologii v meditsine = Modern Technologies in Medicine 2016;8(4):36. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17691/stm2016.8.4.05

58. Taguchi T., Sonobe H., Toyonaga S. et al. Conventionaland molecular cytogenetic characterization of a newhuman cell line, GIST-T1, established from gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Lab Invest 2002;82(5):663–5. DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3780461

59. Wittmann C., Sivchenko A.S., Bacher F. et al. Inhibition of microtubule dynamics in cancer cells by indole-modified latonduine derivatives and their metal complexes. Inorg Chem 2022;61(3):1456–70. DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03154

60. Boichuk S., Dunaev P., Mustafin I. et al. Infigratinib (BGJ 398), a pan-FGFR inhibitor, targets P-glycoprotein and increases chemotherapeutic-induced mortality of multidrug-resistant tumor cells. Biomedicines 2022;10(3):601. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10030601

61. Marupudi N.I., Han J.E., Li K.W. et al. Paclitaxel : a review of adverse toxicities and novel delivery strategies. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2007;6(5):609–21. DOI: 10.1517/14740338.6.5.609

62. Young J.A., Howell S.B., Green M.R. Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of 5-day continuous infusion of vinblastine. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1984;12(1):43–5. DOI: 10.1007/BF00255908

63. Mora E., Smith E.M., Donohoe C. et al. Vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in pediatric cancer patients. Am J Cancer Res 2016;6(11):2416–30.

64. Abu Samaan T.M., Samec M., Liskova A. et al. Paclitaxel’s mechanistic and clinical effects on breast cancer. Biomolecules. 2019;9(12):789. DOI: 10.3390/biom9120789

65. Hashemi M., Zandieh M.A., Talebi Y. et al. Paclitaxel and docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer: molecular mechanisms and possible therapeutic strategies. Biomed Pharmacother 2023;160:114392. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114392

66. Zhang Y., Yang S.H., Guo X.L. New insights into Vinca alkaloids resistance mechanism and circumvention in lung cancer. Biomed Pharmacother 2017;96:659–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.041

67. Toledo B., González-Titos A., Hernández-Camarero P. et al. A brief review on chemoresistance; targeting cancer stem cells as an alternative approach. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24(5):4487. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054487

68. Distefano M., Scambia G., Ferlini C. et al. Antitumor activity of paclitaxel (taxol) analogues on MDR-positive human cancer cells. Anticancer Drug Des 1998;13(5):489–99.

69. Liu J., Yang X., Gao S. et al. DDX11-AS1 modulates DNA damage repair to enhance paclitaxel resistance of lung adenocarcinoma cells. Pharmacogenomics 2023;24(3):163–72. DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2022-0121

70. Kavallaris M., Kuo D.Y., Burkhart C.A. et al. Taxol-resistant epithelial ovarian tumors are associated with altered expression of specific beta-tubulin isotypes. J Clin Investig 1997;100(5): 1282–93. DOI: 10.1172/JCI119642

71. Poruchynsky M.S., Giannakakou P., Ward Y. et al. Accompanying protein alterations in malignant cells with a microtubule-polymerizing drug-resistance phenotype and a primary resistance mechanism. Biochem Pharmacol 2001;62(11):1469–80. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-2952(01)00804-8

72. Houghton J.A., Houghton P.J., Hazelton B.J. et al. In situ selection of a human rhabdomyosarcoma resistant to vincristine with altered beta-tubulins. Cancer Res 1985;45(6):2706–12.

73. Stengel C., Newman S.P., Leese M.P. et al. Class III β-tubulin expression and in vitro resistance to microtubule targeting agents. Br J Cancer 2009;102:316–24. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605489

74. Rodríguez-Antona C. Pharmacogenomics of paclitaxel. Pharmacogenomics 2010;11(5):621–3. DOI: 10.2217/pgs.10.32

75. Ezrahi S., Aserin A., Garti N. Basic principles of drug delivery systems – the case of paclitaxel. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2019;263:95–130. DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2018.11.004

76. Tuy H.D., Shiomi H., Mukaisho K.I. et al. ABCG2 expression in colorectal adenocarcinomas may predict resistance to irinotecan. Oncol Lett 2016;12(4):2752–60. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4937

77. Mooberry S.L., Weiderhold K.N., Dakshanamurthy S. et al. Identification and characterization of a new tubulin-binding tetrasubstituted brominated pyrrole. Mol Pharmacol 2007;72(1):132–40. DOI: 10.1124/mol.107.034876