High MUC16 gene expression levels as a potential prognostic and predictive marker in ovarian cancer
- Authors: Nurgalieva A.K.1, Kuzin K.A.2, Fetisov T.I.2, Knyazev R.I.2, Nevzorova T.A.1, Yakubovskaya M.G.2,3, Kirsanov К.I.2,3, Kiyamova R.G.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
- RUDN University
- Issue: Vol 13, No 1 (2026)
- Pages: 62-71
- Section: RESEARCH ARTICLES
- Published: 16.03.2026
- URL: https://umo.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/838
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/2313-805X-2026-13-1-62-71
- ID: 838
Cite item
Abstract
Introduction. The development of chemoresistance is a key factor limiting the efficacy of ovarian cancer therapy. Although high MUC16 gene expression levels in tumors are a known adverse prognostic factor, its role in predicting response to specific chemotherapeutic agents remains understudied. This led to the hypothesis that the adverse prognostic value of MUC16 expression levels may be mediated by its contribution to the development of chemoresistance.
Aim. To evaluate the association between MUC16 gene expression levels and in vitro resistance to standard chemotherapy agents, including carboplatin, cisplatin, and paclitaxel, as well as key clinicopathological characteristics (BRCA1/2 mutation status, platinum sensitivity) and progression-free survival in patients with ovarian carcinoma.
Materials and methods. Tumor samples were obtained from 35 patients with ovarian malignancies, predominantly high-grade serous carcinoma. MUC16 gene expression levels were determined using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Tumor cell chemoresistance was assessed in vitro in primary cultures using a resazurin metabolic assay, followed by the calculation of the resistance index (Resistance Sensitivity Index, RSI) for each drug. Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman’s rank correlation analysis, the Mann–Whitney U test, and the log-rank test.
Results. High MUC16 gene expression levels were associated with shortened progression-free survival (p = 0.0437). A statistically significant positive correlation was identified between MUC16 gene expression levels and the paclitaxel RSI (R = 0.3614; p = 0.0388). However, no associations were found with the RSI for platinum-based drugs. Furthermore, no relationship was established between MUC16 gene expression levels and BRCA1/2 mutation status (p = 0.8180) or the platinum sensitivity/resistance status of the tumors (p = 0.2899).
Conclusion. High MUC16 gene expression levels are associated with reduced progression-free survival and paclitaxel resistance, suggesting its potential as an unfavorable prognostic and predictive marker. Thus, determining MUC16 gene expression levels prior to therapy may have clinical potential for disease prognosis and for identifying patients for whom taxane-based treatment will likely be ineffective.
Keywords
About the authors
A. K. Nurgalieva
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Email: alsina.nurgalieva@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6242-6037
Biomarker Research Laboratory, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology
Russian Federation, Bld. 1, 18 Kremlyovskaya St., Kazan 420008K. A. Kuzin
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: kuzin_konstantin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8474-8195
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
T. I. Fetisov
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: timkatryam@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5082-9883
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
R. I. Knyazev
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: sluwba@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6341-0897
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
T. A. Nevzorova
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Email: kiyamova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3345-5680
Biomarker Research Laboratory, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology
Russian Federation, Bld. 1, 18 Kremlyovskaya St., Kazan 420008M. G. Yakubovskaya
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia; RUDN University
Email: mgyakubovskaya@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9710-8178
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522; 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow 117198
К. I. Kirsanov
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia; RUDN University
Email: kkirsanov85@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8599-6833
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522; 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow 117198
R. G. Kiyamova
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Author for correspondence.
Email: kiyamova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2547-2843
Biomarker Research Laboratory, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology
Russian Federation, Bld. 1, 18 Kremlyovskaya St., Kazan 420008References
- Jelovac D., Armstrong D. Recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61(3):183–203. doi: 10.3322/caac.20113
- Lheureux S., Braunstein M., Oza A.M. Epithelial ovarian cancer: evolution of management in the era of precision medicine. CA Cancer J Clin 2019;69(4):280–304. doi: 10.3322/caac.21559
- Gaba F., Blyuss O., Chandrasekaran D. et al. Prognosis following surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer and diagnostic criteria predictive of cytoreduction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023;13(22):3484. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223484
- Wang L., Wang X., Zhu X. et al. Drug resistance in ovarian cancer: from mechanism to clinical trial. Mol Cancer 2024;23(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-01967-3
- Atallah G.A., Kampan N.C., Chew K.T. et al. Predicting prognosis and platinum resistance in ovarian cancer: role of immunohistochemistry biomarkers. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24(3):1973. doi: 10.3390/ijms24031973
- Yin B.W., Lloyd K.O. Molecular cloning of the CA125 ovarian cancer antigen: identification as a new mucin, MUC16. J Biol Chem 2001;276(29):27371–5. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103554200
- Felder M., Kapur A., Gonzalez-Bosquet J. et al. MUC16 (CA125): tumor biomarker to cancer therapy, a work in progress. Mol Cancer 2014;13:129. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-129
- Chen X., Sandrine I.K., Yang M. et al. MUC1 and MUC16: critical for immune modulation in cancer therapeutics. Front Immunol 2024;15:1356913. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1356913
- Das S., Rachagani S., Torres-Gonzalez M.P. et al. Carboxyl-terminal domain of MUC16 imparts tumorigenic and metastatic functions through nuclear translocation of JAK2 to pancreatic cancer cells. Oncotarget 2015;6(8):5772–87. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3308
- Thériault C., Pinard M., Comamala M. et al. MUC16 (CA125) regulates epithelial ovarian cancer cell growth, tumorigenesis and metastasis. Gynecol Oncol 2011;121(3):434–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.02.020
- Lakshmanan I., Ponnusamy M., Das S. et al. MUC16 induced rapid G2/M transition via interactions with JAK2 for increased proliferation and anti-apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2012;31:805–17. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.297
- Rao T.D., Tian H., Ma X. et al. Expression of the carboxy-terminal portion of MUC16/CA125 induces transformation and tumor invasion. PLoS One 2015;10(5):e0126633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126633
- Rupert P.B., Buerger M., Friend D.J., Strong R.K. Structural elucidation of the mesothelin-mucin-16/CA125 interaction. Structure 2024;32(8):1049–54.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2024.04.011
- Rump A., Morikawa Y., Tanaka M. et al. Binding of ovarian cancer antigen CA125/MUC16 to mesothelin mediates cell adhesion. J Biol Chem 2004;279(10):9190-8. PMID: 14676194. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312372200
- Gubbels J.A., Belisle J., Onda M. et al. Mesothelin-MUC16 binding is a high affinity, N-glycan dependent interaction that facilitates peritoneal metastasis of ovarian tumors. Mol Cancer 2006;5(1):50. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-5-50
- Belisle J.A., Horibata S., Jennifer G.A. et al. Identification of Siglec-9 as the receptor for MUC16 on human NK cells, B cells, and monocytes. Mol Cancer 2010;9:118. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-118
- Zhai Y., Lu Q., Lou T. et al. MUC16 affects the biological functions of ovarian cancer cells and induces an antitumor immune response by activating dendritic cells. Ann Transl Med 2020;8(22):1494. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-6388
- Boivin M., Lane D., Piché A., Rancourt C. CA125 (MUC16) tumor antigen selectively modulates the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to genotoxic drug-induced apoptosis. Gynecol Oncol 2009;115(3):407–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.08.007
- Giamougiannis P., Martin-Hirsch P.L., Martin F.L. The evolving role of MUC16 (CA125) in the transformation of ovarian cells and the progression of neoplasia. Carcinogenesis 2021;42(3):327–43. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgab010
- Sui M., Yang H., Guo M. et al. Cajanol sensitizes A2780/taxol cells to paclitaxel by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt/NF-κB signaling pathway. Front Pharmacol 2021;12:783317. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.783317
Supplementary files


